Multi-Level Assessment of Community-Led Total Sanitation Performance across Local Government Areas in Nigeria
Abstract
Open defecation remains a significant environmental and public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries, contributing to diarrheal diseases, cholera, typhoid fever, and other sanitation-related infections. Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is a community-based behavioral change approach that promotes the elimination of open defecation through collective action and community mobilization. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CLTS in improving sanitation coverage and reducing open defecation in selected communities of Benue and Cross River States, Nigeria. A multilevel observational study was conducted using complete household enumeration data from 79,095 households across five Local Government Areas. Data was obtained from household sanitation records, structured monitoring tools, observational checklists, and programme reports. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, two-proportion z-tests, and Difference-in-Differences logistic regression with cluster-robust standard errors were applied to assess programme effectiveness. Improved sanitation coverage increased significantly from 9.60% before implementation to 22.55% after implementation, representing a 12.95 percentage-point improvement (p < 0.001), while open defecation declined from 56.99% to 7.24%, a 49.75 percentage-point reduction. Cross River State achieved greater improvements than Benue State, with a significantly stronger intervention effect (OR = 4.41; p < 0.001). The findings demonstrate that CLTS is an effective strategy for improving sanitation coverage and reducing open defecation, highlighting the importance of sustained community participation, effective local leadership, and continuous programme monitoring to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 6.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
Open defecation (OD) remains one of the most pressing environmental sanitation and public health challenges worldwide. Although significant progress has been made in expanding access to sanitation facilities over the past two decades, an estimated 1.5 billion people still lack safely managed sanitation services, while approximately 419 million people continue to practise open defecation, particularly in rural communities of low- and middle-income countries [1]. The continued practice of open defecation contaminates soil and water sources, promotes the transmission of faecal-oral diseases such as diarrhoea, cholera, typhoid fever and intestinal helminth infections, and contributes substantially to childhood morbidity and mortality. Poor sanitation also undermines environmental sustainability, economic productivity and human dignity, making it a major barrier to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 which seeks universal access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene by 2030 [2].
Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) has emerged as one of the most widely implemented community-based approaches for eliminating open defecation in developing countries [3]. First introduced in Bangladesh and subsequently adopted in India, Africa and several Asian countries, CLTS promotes collective behavioural change by encouraging communities to recognise the health and environmental consequences of open defecation and take collective responsibility for ending the practice without relying primarily on external subsidies [4]. Unlike conventional sanitation programmes that focus mainly on constructing toilets, CLTS emphasises community mobilisation, social accountability, local leadership and behavioural transformation as pathways towards achieving and sustaining Open Defecation-Free (ODF) status [5]. Recent studies have demonstrated that CLTS can substantially improve sanitation outcomes when effectively implemented. In Ghana, Adam and Badu in 2026 [5] reported sustained improvements in sanitation practices and increased community participation following CLTS implementation. Similarly, [6] found significant improvements in sanitation coverage associated with community-driven interventions, while [7] highlighted the contribution of behaviour-centred sanitation programmes to reducing open defecation in India. These findings suggest that while CLTS can improve sanitation outcomes, programme performance differs across locations due to variations in governance structures, community participation, resource availability and post-triggering support.
Nigeria remains among the countries with a substantial burden of open defecation despite sustained investments in sanitation programmes. Although national initiatives such as the Clean Nigeria: Use the Toilet Campaign and the implementation of CLTS have contributed to gradual improvements in sanitation coverage, progress remains uneven across states and Local Government Areas. Differences in political commitment, institutional capacity, cultural practices and socio-economic conditions continue to influence programme effectiveness, resulting in considerable disparities in sanitation outcomes between communities. Most previous studies evaluating CLTS in Nigeria have focused on single communities, individual Local Government Areas or specific states, with limited attention given to comparing programme performance across multiple administrative levels. Consequently, there is inadequate evidence on how sanitation outcomes vary simultaneously across states, Local Government Areas and wards following CLTS implementation [8]. Such information is essential for identifying geographical disparities, strengthening implementation strategies and improving resource allocation for sanitation programmes. Addressing this knowledge gap is critical for accelerating progress towards national sanitation targets and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 6.
This study therefore conducted a multi-level assessment of Community-Led Total Sanitation performance across selected Local Government Areas in Benue and Cross River States, Nigeria. Specifically, the study evaluated changes in improved sanitation coverage and open defecation prevalence before and after CLTS implementation at state, Local Government Area and ward levels, and compared programme performance across the different administrative units using appropriate statistical techniques.
Conclusion
This study assessed the performance of Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) in improving sanitation access and reducing open defecation across selected Local Government Areas in Benue and Cross River States, Nigeria. The findings demonstrated that CLTS was highly effective in promoting positive sanitation outcomes, with improved sanitation coverage increasing from 9.60% to 22.55%, while open defecation declined substantially from 56.99% to 7.24% following implementation. These improvements were statistically significant, confirming the effectiveness of the intervention in changing sanitation behaviors at the household and community levels.
The study further established that the impact of CLTS varied across implementation areas. Cross River State achieved significantly greater improvements than Benue State, recording a 32.85 percentage-point increase in improved sanitation coverage and virtually eliminating open defecation. At the LGA level, Bekwarra recorded the highest sanitation gains, highlighting the influence of strong community participation, effective facilitation and sustained post-triggering activities on programme success. The findings also showed that although households in all LGAs adopted improved sanitation facilities, the types of technologies differed, with Benue relying predominantly on pit latrines while Cross River demonstrated greater adoption of improved sanitation technologies.
Overall, the study provides strong evidence that Community-Led Total Sanitation remains an effective community-based strategy for eliminating open defecation and improving sanitation access in rural Nigeria. However, the variation in outcomes across states and LGAs suggests that implementation should be tailored to local socioeconomic and cultural contexts. Strengthening community ownership, promoting gradual upgrading to improved sanitation technologies and sustaining post-intervention monitoring will be essential for maintaining sanitation gains and accelerating progress towards the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 6 on universal access to safely managed sanitation.
References
- Asiimwe, J. B., et al. (2025). Effect of community-led total sanitation on open defecation in Uganda: A propensity score-matched analysis. PLoS One, *20*(7), e0329307. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0329307
- Baayenda, G., et al. (2025). Eritrea's blueprint for trachoma elimination: A home-grown model for sustainable impact. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, *152*, 107814. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJID.2025.107814
- Das, R., Mondal, S., & Chakraborty, M. (2025). Demystifying open defecation in the capital city of Delhi, India. Cities Health, *9*(3), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2024.2439643
- Demoze, L., et al. (2025). Determinants and geographic distribution of unimproved sanitation facilities in sub-Saharan Africa, spatial and multilevel analysis using demographic and health survey (DHS) data. BMC Public Health, *25*(1), 2848. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-025-24184-Z
- Ezenwaka, U., et al. (2026). Designing context-specific implementation strategies to improve water, sanitation, and hygiene in urban low-income settlements in Nigeria: Outcome of stakeholders' collaborative approach. Frontiers in Public Health, *14*, 1742248. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2026.1742248/TEXT
- Ezenwaka, U., Okeke, C., Ojiakor, I., Nwankwo, J., Nzeadibe, C., & Onwujekwe, O. (2026). Effectiveness and implementation contexts of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2026.2645408
- Fagunwa, O. E., et al. (2023). Priority regions for eliminating open defecation in Africa: Implications for antimicrobial resistance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, *27*(1), 2675-2699. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-023-03992-6
- Garga Mu'azu, U. (n.d.). Understanding sanitation practices in Nigeria: Exploring the relationship of socioeconomic factors, demographics and environmental contexts. https://doi.org/10.17028/RD.LBORO.30776036.V1
- Gbeti, C., Donkor, I. A., & Wumbei, A. (2026). Predictors of open defecation amidst community-led total sanitation approach. Discover Public Health, *23*(1), 685. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12982-026-01975-2
- Jacob, D. E. (2026). Education and behavioral changes for safe water usage. Springer Water, Part F1314, 217-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10602-5_8/SAVE-RESEARCH
- Khatun, S., Alam, A., & Biswas, S. (2026). Unlocking SDG-6: Accelerating WASH for health and equity in developing countries: A comprehensive systematic review with a focus on India. In The impact of water scarcity and malnutrition on rural women's health (pp. 265-289). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10887-6_13
- Kim, D., et al. (2026). Waterborne diseases burden, determinants and health system gaps in Eastern Uganda: A mixed-methods baseline study in the Busoga region. Frontiers in Public Health, *14*, 1808626. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2026.1808626/TEXT
- Kyambade, M., Mwesigwa, R., Alinda, K., Tumwine, S., & Lwanga, F. (2026). A qualitative exploration of social sustainability performance in health and sanitation projects. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.71104
- Makita, A., & Calanzani, N. (2026). Community-based interventions addressing open defecation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Global Health Action, *19*(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2026.2655033
- Mehta, L., et al. (2026). Urban community-led total sanitation: Opportunities, barriers and lessons from Nanded, India. World Development, *205*, 107336. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2026.107336
- Myers, J., Tembe, É., Hutchings, P., Bartram, J., & Evans, B. (2026). Does peer learning improve local government capacity to improve sanitation? A contribution analysis in rural Mozambique. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, *271*, 114701. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEH.2025.114701
- Napoleon Kobhamologi, O., Kalagbor, I., Bealo, B., & Cookey, E. (2025). Impact of community-led total sanitation on the eradication of open defecation in Nigeria: A systematic review. Journal of Nwashdev, *1*(2), 288-303.
- Ologunagba, M. M., Ogunbode, T. O., & Owoeye, O. M. (2025). Public perception of environmental sanitation regulations on solid waste management in Owo and Akure cities, Ondo State, Nigeria. Scientific Reports, *15*(1), 37799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21714-y
- Pakin dam, D., et al. (2024). Evaluation of the community-led total sanitation in Bongo District, Ghana. https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-25-00293
- Panulo, M., et al. (2026). Community-led total sanitation implementation in Malawi: Process evaluation of a sanitation and hygiene intervention. Global Public Health, *21*(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2026.2638018
- Pawar, S., Chougule, M., & Channaveer, R. M. (2025). Human capital and stakeholder engagement intervention: A women empowerment pathway to achieve sustainable community development in water, sanitation, and hygiene at Vaijapur Village of Karnataka, India. Frontiers in Sustainability, *6*, 1562033. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRSUS.2025.1562033/TEXT
- Wang, R., & Spicer, J. (2026). "All roads lead to Rome?" Performance evaluation across different types of community land trusts based on a large-scale survey. Journal of Urban Affairs, *48*(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2024.2371400
- Yang, Y., Han, H., Li, S., Fu, J., Su, X., & Fan, C. (2026). A multilevel regression model to explain disparities in residential cooling infrastructure across heat-threatened regions. Applied Geography, *189*, 103939. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOG.2026.103939.
